| Futurama | Weeknights, 9p/8c | |||
| Bureaucrat's Song | ||||
| ||||
How Hermes Requisitioned his Groove Back.
Courtesy of Classmate Kristen and Comedy Central.
This is a blog for the community of Sociology 101B: "Sociological Theory," in the Department of Sociology at the University of California, Berkeley, Spring 2009.
| Futurama | Weeknights, 9p/8c | |||
| Bureaucrat's Song | ||||
| comedycentral.com | ||||
| ||||
The Berkeley Undergraduate Sociology Association will sponsor a review session to discuss the SOC 101B Midterm on Tuesday, April 14 from 5:30-7:30 p.m. in Barrows 420. If you attended the SOC 101A review sessions last semester, you'd probably attest that more than 50 minds brooding over an exam equals some really good ideas.

Click for full article.“People think that spiritual patients are more likely to say their lives are in God’s hands — ’Let what happens happen’ — but in fact we know they want more aggressive care,” said Holly G. Prigerson, the study’s senior author and director of the Center for Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care Research at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston.
“To religious people, life is sacred and sanctified,” Dr. Prigerson said, “and there’s a sense they feel it’s their duty and obligation to stay alive as long as possible.”

Last week, a juror in a big federal drug trial in Florida admitted to the judge that he had been doing research on the case on the Internet, directly violating the judge’s instructions and centuries of legal rules. But when the judge questioned the rest of the jury, he got an even bigger shock.Eight other jurors had been doing the same thing. The federal judge, William J. Zloch, had no choice but to declare a mistrial, a waste of eight weeks of work by federal prosecutors and defense lawyers.
“We were stunned,” said a defense lawyer, Peter Raben, who was told by the jury that he had been on the verge of winning the case. “It’s the first time modern technology struck us in that fashion, and it hit us right over the head.”
It might be called a Google mistrial. The use of BlackBerrys and iPhones by jurors gathering and sending out information about cases is wreaking havoc on trials around the country, upending deliberations and infuriating judges.
Apparently courts want to restrict jurors knowledge and judgement to that of what the court, and both sides of the case have agreed upon. Controlling internet searches is no easy feat, but judges are able to gather information about jurors outside information by cell phone text message records, twitter, and looking at jurors online blogs. (Yet I still can't bring myself to delete my Facebook profile) Do you think this control of juror's given information is just? What would Foucault say?
TEMPE, Ariz. — Mark Cooper started his work day on a recent morning cleaning the door handles of an office building with a rag, vigorously shaking out a rug at a back entrance and pushing a dust mop down a long hallway.
Nine months ago he lost his job as the security manager for the western United States for a Fortune 500 company, overseeing a budget of $1.2 million and earning about $70,000 a year. Now he is grateful for the $12 an hour he makes in what is known in unemployment circles as a “survival job” at a friend’s janitorial services company. But that does not make the work any easier.
“You’re fighting despair, discouragement, depression every day,” Mr. Cooper said.
